Business

The role of remittance in the economic development of Somaliland

January 7, 2012   ·   27 Comments

Dr Adam Ismail Hassan

By Adam Ismail Hassan, PhD

1. INTRODUCTION

The international remittance markets have grown dramatically in many parts of the world for the past two decades or so. Yet their critical roles in the economic development of least developed countries are not widely known and acknowledged in the field of economics, finance and related academic studies. The importance of remittance for the people of Somaliland since the collapse of the Somali state in 1991, engendering the breakdown of all institutions including national and international payment systems (banking), cannot be denied. Remittance services have provided lifeline for the majority of poor households as they mitigate vulnerability and sustain livelihoods among the population, through timely cash payments. In other words both needy families and individuals in urban and rural localities in Somaliland receive vital small amounts of money sent by their migrant or refugee relatives from the Diaspora, particularly, from Europe, North America and the Middle East with the aim of supporting their family members back home, where most seem to endure abject poverty and low income aggravated by lack of economic and employment opportunities. In the meantime it is important to note here that remittance money tends to have significant impact on the socio-economic situation of the population particularly by empowering marginalized women as they represent the majority of recipients for most of the small amounts remitted for livelihood security.

This article seeks to explore the history, scope, importance and influence of remittance in the economy of Somaliland which has been growing at an estimated rate of 8% to 11% annually for the past 5 years. The article will also describe the major remittance companies in the country, their share of the transfer market and how they play a vital role in investment and trade as well as how they provide fast, affordable and reliable money transfer services, which reaches down to the most isolated rural villages and settlements, in a country where national and international payment systems have completely broken down and where these remittance companies have filled in that void to work as local depositors (banks). I decided to write this article, which is the first of its kind in Somaliland, in order to inform both the Somaliland government and to the wider world and in particular the US administration about the importance of remittance for the people of Somaliland, as well as for other Somalis in general, given the recent decision from the American bank (Sunrise Community Banks in Minnesota) to stop allowing Somali-owned remittance companies to wire their money through the bank, it is important to accentuate vital role of remittance for the economic development of Somaliland as well as for the livelihood and security of the population.

2. HISTORY OF REMITTANCE IN SOMALILAND

Remitting some of their earnings back to their families has always been part of the Somaliland migrants who worked abroad. However, in the old days migrants from Somaliland used to remit money to their relatives either via international bank transfers or via couriers from other migrants, usually, from the same clan or locality. The former method was expensive and took longer but safer, while the latter was free of charge and quicker but riskier. A third method known as “Hawala” which involved remitting cash was started during the oil boom of the 1970s and 1980s when large number of Somaliland migrant workers in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf countries needed to send remittance to their families back home. The traders and their agents would collect money from those migrants/workers to deliver to their families. This process equally involved in long delays and was not a risk free at all, however it was this method which was later improved.

The scope of remittance in Somaliland, was transformed after the break-out of civil conflict in Somalia which resulted in more than quarter of a million Somalilanders fleeing their homes to seek refugee status in Western Europe, North America and other parts of the world and further half a million became either internally displaced or refugees in neighboring countries (most in Ethiopia). Those refugees and immigrants from Somaliland wanted to help relatives they left behind by way of financial assistance (cash). Some of those traders who were involved in the remittance business like Dahabshiil, who was already engaged in the money transfer business, albeit in a small scale, realized the urgent need for an organized corporate structure to provide prompt remittance to the people of Somaliland. Thus, the present form of remittance came into being in Somaliland and in other Somali populated regions of the Horn of Africa, and in the absence of banking services in Somaliland remittance companies have managed to provide some financial services to the population of the country.

3. SCOPE OF REMITTANCE

Aside from the vital small amounts of money sent by relatives from the Diaspora, particularly in Europe and North America, to support their dependants back home, most of whom have been enduring harsh poverty aggravated by civil conflict, the remittance services provided by money transfer companies contribute to investments, commerce and reconstruction projects in the region. In the absence of internationally recognized bank in Somaliland, these remittance companies are considered as reliable and trustworthy “local Banks”. They provide some of the facilities offered by conventional Banks, such as saving and current accounts to individuals, private companies and international organizations, thus facilitating international payments for imports. In addition to the key roles that remittance companies play in the economic development of the country in terms of trade, investment and livelihood security they are also considered as one of the biggest private sector employers in Somaliland, employing around 4,000 people directly.

Remittance money constitutes an important sector of the Somaliland economy, but there is little accurate information about the actual volume of the cash flow passing through money transfer companies. However, the closest estimate of remittance that flows into the country could be in the region of US$780 Million annually. About 30% of this (US$234 Million) comes in as capital and/or financial investments and the remaining 70% (US$546 Million) comes in as small money between US$100 and US$500, received as household maintenance for families and individuals. Given this fact it would be true to argue that today in Somaliland remittance is by far the biggest contributor to the economy (i.e. 54% of the country’s GDP).

The successful growth of remittance companies in Somaliland is almost completely dependent on social capital – namely the cohesiveness and trust within communities (clans). Had it not been for the existence of this social capital and the safe “Hawala” system of financial transfers across continents, people from Somaliland would have not have had access to assistance from the Diaspora and would have suffered much greater deprivation during and after the civil conflict, and perhaps the large scale and rapid growth in capital investment, commerce and trade would not have happened at all.

Today there are about 15 companies in the industry including the international giant Western Union, who has just opened its first branch in Somaliland. Some of the main remittances and financial service providing companies that are active in Somaliland include Dahabshiil, Qaran, Mustaqbal, Amal, and Kaah etc. The chart below describes the market share among remittance companies operating in Somaliland.

Market share chart
 The role of remittance in the economic development of Somaliland

Source: Dahabshiil Money Transfer Services Market Research, November 2010

The main advantage of the money transfer operations is that it is simple, convenient, basic, cheap and reliable. These financial service providers are keen in developing their businesses not only as remittances but also as local banks in the future (commercial banks), and may including offering loans to small businesses. However, the possibility of financial intermediation from these remittance companies is hindered by lack of legal and regulatory framework as there is no Banking Law in Somaliland yet, something that is continuing to have a big “opportunity cost” for the country’s economic development.

In other words some money transfer companies now offer a wider range of “Bank-like” services such as savings and deposits (non-interest bearing deposits) and they may also provide consumer lending in the form of small loans. However, this may require some sort of a “guarantor”, which could be based either on kinship and clan affiliation or through social capital and trust. In most cases the source of financial assistance in the form of small credit is obtained from relatives and friends, who lend cash to those who want to set up businesses, in return for future goodwill. Business lending by remittance companies seems unviable even with collateral, both for religious reasons, and due to business preferences for direct involvement of an investor/lender in the operations they are financing. Limited short-term trade credit (against security such as fixed assets) is sometimes available from main remittance companies. But even in those circumstances there are some risks involved in lending, due to lack of legal obligations and regulatory framework from the part of the government, which makes the need to re-establish conventional banks imperative.

4. CHARACTERSITICS OF FINANCIAL SECTOR IN SOMALILAND

In order to comprehend fully the current status of the financial sector in Somaliland, which can be best described as a post-conflict “cash economy” situation, it is important to assess the financial sector of Somaliland, where despite relative peace, security, stability, functioning administration and parliamentary democracy the country is regarded as a risk zone by the international lenders and investors. The situation is compounded by the lack of government legislation on banking and public finance management resulting in the sector being generally characterized by the following:

  • Lack of legal and regulatory banking structures;
  • Absence of classical central bank role;
  • None-existent international and domestic payment systems;
  • Cessation of most lending activities within the country;
  • Almost non-existent deposit taking activities by the bank;
  • Stoppage of international correspondent banking relationships;
  • Unstable exchange rate;

In addition to the above it will be correct to argue that, today, Somaliland is essentially a cash society where there is no common platform for international or domestic payments between existing financial institutions. This means that cash and payment orders are the only meaningful payment instruments widely used in the economy and no clearing and settlement system is in operation inside the country. Thus, it is important to note here that normally in a country like Somaliland, where international and domestic payment systems have ceased to function twenty years ago, after the collapse of the Somali state, followed by break down of all state institutions including banking sector, and created the above cited financial sector problems, re-establishing banks to facilitate international and domestic payment systems should be a priority for Somaliland. In other words the re-establishment of conventional banks in Somaliland would contribute towards the economic development of the country in terms of trade and investment, something that has been currently done via remittance albeit partially.

5. ROLE OF REMITTANCE

The role of remittance in Somaliland is extremely important towards the economic regeneration of the country by helping drive the economic engine through cash circulation and large transfers that are used for goods importation, investment and reconstruction, on the one hand, and through small amounts of remittance for families and individuals sent by refugees and migrant relatives from developed and rich countries for livelihood security and maintenance, on the other. Both of these types of transfer services provided by various remittance companies have been indispensible for family survival or household maintenance, acquisition of basic social services and small businesses that all depend on speedy and reliable transfers in and out of the country for import/export payments.

This means that remittance money in Somaliland has not only played a positive role towards economic development and livelihood improvements but also in conflict reduction and stability by allowing poor households to receive vital maintenance money, sent by their relatives from the Diaspora, (it is estimated that nearly 44% of all households in major towns get monthly maintenance from their relatives abroad), without a delay (instant cash within few hours, in most cases), thereby allowing enterprise and trade to grow, enabling authorities from Somaliland to collect import taxations and other tariffs, which are in turn spent on security to sustain peace and stability and on social development and reconstruction programs.

Moreover, in the current situation in Somaliland where the banking legislation has not yet been passed by the parliament due to some resistance coming from the part of the remittance companies who enjoy extensive influence over the financial sector of the country as they have filled in the void and acted as a substitute to conventional banks and created their informal ways of contributing to trade, investment, commerce, cash movements and reconstruction efforts through:

• In/out flow of capital;
• Trade facilitation;
• Internal or local transfers;
• International payments for aid agencies;
• Financial intermediation;
• Reconstruction projects;
As already explained elsewhere in this article in addition to providing the above mentioned financial services Somali-owned remittance services have got comparative advantage over other multi-national money transfer companies, such as Western Union and Money Gram by virtue of their faster, simpler, hassle-free, more convenient and low operational cost services, as they can easily reach right to the smallest rural village to deliver their services. Indeed, in a post conflict situation, where there has been an absence of internationally recognized or conventional banks, in Somaliland money transfer companies are considered to be “local Banks” as they not only provide reliable and trust-worthy money transfer services but also basic banking provisions, including deposit and saving accounts etc. Another recent remittance phenomenon in Somaliland is the “mobile transfers” known as ZAAD which was started at the end of 2008 and has been growing at a spectacular rate and has totally dominated the local transfers over such a short period of time (research shows that more than 95% of small local transfers are now done through ZAAD.

6. DOWNSIDE OF REMITTANCE

Although the paramount importance of remittance and its role both on the economic development and livelihood security in Somaliland and the phenomenal success of remittance companies during the past two decades or so cannot be denied as explained in this article there are nevertheless some people who believe that remittance money has caused a great deal of damage including: creating remittance dependency culture; rendering “dollarization” of the economy; increasing inflation and money laundering; encouraging human trafficking as well as fuelling clan and religious tensions through instant cash supplies etc. However, regardless of the pros and cons of the subject there is no doubt that remittance companies would face certain challenges in the future and some of these challenges would include:

  • Stiffer competition from conventional banks;
  • Economic slowdown in those affluent countries, where most of the money is remitted from;
  • Stringent regulations by individual countries and regional bodies intended to counter fraud, money laundering and provision of funds to global terror networks;
  • Demographic and attitudinal change amongst the children of migrants and refugees who might feel less obliged to send cash to their relatives back home;

In this regard it would mean that the outcome of these challenges could negatively impact upon the performance and efficiency of remittance companies in the future thereby threatening their economic viability and long-term sustainability. Despite these challenges, however, it is expected that international remittance industry has got a brighter future and had already made appropriate measures to adjust to some of those challenges.

7. CONCLUSION

By way of conclusion there is no doubt that the remittance sector is a thriving and important financial sector in Somaliland not only in terms of trade and investment but also in reconstruction, development and livelihood security. Hence remittance industry can no longer be left in the fringes of financial sectors or the periphery of microeconomic level and its informal economic dynamics. In fact today Somaliland like in many least developed countries, with large migrant population in the Diaspora income from remittances is the largest contributor to the economy (54% of the GDP) relegating export earnings from livestock into the second spot as the main income. However, it must be taken into account that the sector faces both challenges and opportunities. The effects of these challenges could negatively impact upon the performance and efficiency of the remittance industry thereby threatening its economic viability and long-term sustainability.

Despite these challenges, nevertheless, this article argues that remittance services have got a brighter future provided they made appropriate measures to adjust to some of the challenges cited in this article. In this regard it is hoped that Somali-owned remittance companies will rise up to these challenges and put their houses in order, in terms of adopting robust and rigorous anti-money laundering policies and procedures to alley the sort of fears raised by foreign banks like Sunrise Community Banks in Minnesota who announced last week that they will stop processing remittances to Somalia/Somaliland on the one hand, and stop using its enormous influence to resist the Somaliland parliament to pass the bending banking regulations on the other, as that will unchain the country’s financial services for the benefit of everyone in the country and contribute towards more economic recovery and growth through international investment and trade resulting better future for the citizens of the country and further assist the government to strengthen its institutions.

Email this story Email this story

By

Tags: , , , , ,


Readers Comments (27)

  1. Zakariye says:

    What an article Mr.Adam. This is yet another masterpiece and excellent writing from this great writer. I must confess that I like your style of writing and I have read your articles with great admiration because I found them very refreshing and educational.

    Mr. Adam your articles bear witness to your intellect and enormous knowledge in the field of economics and development and I believe that we need people like you to be part of the Somaliland government so that you can steer the country towards the right development track. Mr. Adam keep writing and we will all learn from you and well done.

     Reply
    • M Hassan says:

      Enough cheese my man.

       Reply
  2. Yasiin says:

    good stuff and a lot of information. But I think you will be better of to come and work for the FTG because most of the money comes to Somalia and not to your so called Somaliland and you could be a good advisor for President Sh Sharif Sh Ahmed on these matters.

     Reply
    • Gobaad says:

      That is an insult to Mr. Adam's intelligence to work under Macalin Quran, Yassin! Mr. Adam is home where he belongs.

       Reply
  3. AhmedY says:

    Yasiin

    Q: What does FTG stand for?
    A: Fragile Transitional Government. So, why would someone in his own mind go there when he / she can enjoy peace in Somaliland?

     Reply
  4. Gobaad says:

    Triple thumbs up for a job well done and yet another well articulated and well written article. Way to go and keep it up, Mr. Adam!

     Reply
  5. Yasiin says:

    I acknowledged the work that this guy has done but at the sametime invited him to come and work for the TFG because you all know that more than 75% of all remittance goes to Somalia and not to your little impovershed so called somaliland and if you don’t have to take for my word just ask any of the remittance companies. I hope he will listen to my suggestion pack up his bags and come to the capital of Somalia where live is returning to normal and he will be made in charge of international remittance program because in your little so called somaliland you don’t have enough positions to round for highly eductated people like him.

     Reply
    • ahmed says:

      let us say Somalia get as you say 75%. due to the larger population.

      When you achieve stable peacefull society we will all be intested to visit Somalia ..

       Reply
  6. Gobaad says:

    No, thanks Yassin, even the 75% of remittance goes that to Somalia as you mentioned is no where to be seen, no checks or balance. killings, corruption, drought and the fist fighting lately in the Parliament is the order of the day. Why would anybody in thei right mind want to go that hell-hole!

    Mr. Adam is happy where he is and a valuable member of nation at his brith place.

     Reply
  7. Kayse says:

    Yassin sorry son, 50-60% of all remittance sent by Somali diasporas goes to Somaliland and this is a fact and it is the reason, two of Somaliland's money transfer are the largest businesses in the industry. I am talking about Dahabshiil and Qaran Express (small percentage is owned by former Al Barakat), same as SomTel.

    Dahabshiil calls Somaliland home and its the largest African money transfer.
    Qaran Express calls Somaliland home and its the second largest.
    Western Union only has one office in Somali territories and its in Hargeisa.

    All this indicate that this region is the leader in remittance, after all we Somalilanders were the ones that introduced the business to Somalis.

     Reply
  8. I Jama says:

    Very informative and interesting. Somaliland government hopefully will takeover these institutions instead of just starting from scratch. I think they should find a route to consolidated the banking which separates itself from Somalia. This is necessary and will help identify itself Independently from the risks associated.

     Reply
  9. mohamed cheers says:

    The Hawalas are a good source for the Diaspora Somalis to send monies to their poor families
    back home. However, for more international affluent banking institutions to replace the Hawalas
    or even to create some sort of partnerships, such processes would be easily achievable if/when
    the unrecognized Somaliland somehow gets recognition to become a full membership of the UN.
    Let's see what's in the IC minds about the Somaliland status quo issues.
    Cheers.

     Reply
  10. I Jama says:

    I actually think it is an opportunity and the right time for Somalilanders to reduce their dependency on cash remittances by allowing for greater access to other banking facilities. Using bank accounts offered allowes for economic development. Whilst allowing for greater access to public information to allow the government to manage demand. Although the poorest of the poor will still need emergency money but on the whole Somalilanders will do well to starting moving forward and invest more to allow for loans to small business i.e development.

    The diaspora can also encourage their loved ones to open accounts to enable bank transfers. Like using debit cards to transfer payments or mobile transfers etc.

     Reply
  11. A. Xandule says:

    Well written and very informative article. The author must have researched the subject ver well otherwise he wouldn’t have known all this data.

    I agree with others that what Somaliland needs now is proper banking institutions and what the hell our parliamentarians are there for if they can’t pass the banking laws, as the author indicated in the article. i think that passing this law should be their litmus test otherwise they must not be re-elected in the coming parliamentary elections because without banking sector the economy would not grow. I propose the author should give the parliamentarians a lecture on this issues. Thumps up for the author.

     Reply
  12. kabiir says:

    Just dream on my friends, cos somaliland will never get recognition. Central bank of somalia will be established and all the monies will come to somalia. The government in mogadishu will ask the whole world to ignore you and you will be forced to come to us of course begging us forgiveness.

    After that all money transfer comapnies will come to mogadishu and dahabshiil will establish his head office in mogadishu and if he refuse he will not work in somalia. For your information he already asked help to the TFG. So stop dreaming my friends and give up somaliland you are part of somalia.kkkkkk

     Reply
    • Kayse says:

      Listen son of a warlord aka vampire, the only money "Somali central bank" manages is blood money.

      I didn't know Somalia had a central bank, explain to me, is it the pirates printing money in Bosaaso, the mooryaan in central regions, the al shabaab in mini skirt in Kismayo or that Sheikh you call a president with the trash worth 250,000 against the Dollar?

      Every warlord is a central bank in your Somalia. Im sure your father is printing some now in the back of his Abdi Bile truck. Get lost warlord go suck some blood.

       Reply
    • A. Xandule says:

      I totally disagree with what that Kabiir guy has written which is about establishing Somalia central bank. I think he is barking mad because people who can not simply agree among themselves to be in the same building are not capable of agreeing to pass a complicated banking law unless of course they come up with a new government called "Ken-som-pia" meaning Kenya, Somalia and Ethiopia.

       Reply
  13. Berri says:

    @Kayse makes me Involuntary laughter in his realty shootings

     Reply
  14. Berri says:

    Unclearly Definition of Somaliland and Somalia as Two Different Entitles and Conditions

    Yes, no without double, it is well written of technocrat mind of banking and financial institutional based analysis article with minor observations.

    As we recall the time of President' Government when US Banned Bracket for good as terrorist backing financial while Dahabshiil Money Transfer Services working as normal since when Somaliland requested this our related Institutional, so always keep that in mind, I have some strange mixture s by the author of Somaliland and Somaliland

    General Notes
    In 15,461 characters and 2,875 worlds, the Author used excessively both worlds Somalia and civil wars combined more than 3% in total content when tested in wording analytic tool.
    No independent mentioned
    No mentioned Somaliland as separated entity except # 4 as financial aspect NOT political aspect.
    No mentioned the Core -two terrorist women arrested and caused this remittance chaos
    Expression of Civil Wars going in both countries without clear exclusion of Somaliland peaceful stability.

    Technical Notes
    This is relieve Electronic Transactions Devices and convenient services but has very fraud base implications in monetary systems. So, should be indicated the hanging imminent danger of being run over and threateningly Risky Factor involving mobile transfers” known as ZAAD in terms of banking provisions which many users/citizens unaware of.
    As no required working reserve deposits to save guide the huge un secured deposits that estimated a volume of $300 million per month. Many confirmed sources also indicating the 90% whole funds investing in aboard. Another far is, this uncontrolled institutions is planning to impose fees charges in every transaction in near future.
    Macro and micro economic in terms of NGP vs GNP should be separated defined as foreign remittance is not fallen under category of Nation Gross Product ( GNP) in measuring annual growth.

     Reply
    • mohamed cheers says:

      Tku Mr. Berri. I also noticed and confused too not only in this article but in fact through frequently
      regular articles spellout Somaliland for Somalia and Somaliland, always categorically defining
      Somaliland as part of Somalia. Such common practices keeps me in wilderness and puts me
      to suspect the Sldpress for not showing concerns on such damaging articles of bad intents for
      the Independence of Somaliland.
      Cheers.

       Reply
    • Zakariye says:

      I don’t think you have read the entire article whatever your name is Berri or Barry!! I have read the article thoroughly and I noticed no confusion at all. The author made it clear that Somaliland and Somalia were not the one and the same thing but sometimes the two words Somalia and Somaliland are interchangible given the history that we share, for example:
      - The collapse of the Somali state and we in Somaliland were part of that state
      - We are ethnic Somalis and that does not make us citizens from Somalia
      - Our language is Somali and that means it belongs to all ethnic Somalis
      - Money transfer companies are referred as Somali owned remittance companies
      - All UN and Donor programs refer us as Somalia at least on paper
      - Somali populated regions means regions in the horn of africa populated by Somalis including Somaliland. So let us not talk here about semantics but rather let us debate about the merits of the article and the broader issues it has raised in terms of how the success story of remittance be allowed to continue with minimum disruption to people’s livelihoods in the wake of what happened in Minnesota and the wider urgent need to pass the banking laws etc.

       Reply
      • Zakariye says:

        On the issue of general notes, you got it wrong my friend, and the statistics of the article are the follwing:
        2913 Words, 7 Pages, 18,913 Characters, 75 Paragraphs and 337 Lines. The author didn't overuse, as you wrongly claimed, the terms of Somaliland and civil wars (he used Somaliland 46 times and this is so because he probably wanted to get away from using the term Somalia too much and he civil wars only 3 times). On technical notes: ZAAD is indeed a new phenomenon, as mentioned by the author, but you are right the author didn't make the risk associated with it clear, and I think people should be made aware of these risks.

         Reply
        • Zakariye says:

          As for the question of GNP it measures the output generated by a country's enterprises (whether physically located domestically or abroad) while the GDP measures the total output produced within a country's borders – whether produced by that country's own firms or not. However both are methods used to measure a country's performance. In the case of Somaliand as in any other countries remittacne money comes in as hard cash and used to improve output and that is why it contributes towards the country's GDP. But what I find more bizarre is that you mentioned "NGP" which is not a term used in the economics. Finally all I can say is get your facts right before you try to score cheap points against authors like Mr Adam who took the trouble to write some valuable piece about the economy of our country and learn from his expertise.

           Reply
  15. Berri says:

    Yeah Mohammed you right but that's of matter an opinion whether it's explicitly or implicitly by the Author, so, I think it's our responsibility as panel to comment freely, nationally and professionally.

    Come back to part/ 2 …Simplification of the Comment on Risky Factor ZAAD

    To Simply that issue, let's go back to the basic of financial theories. We know that in any country there is a Central Bank in control all transactional monetary systems obviously Somaliland no exceptions.

    Means whether that country has local 5 or 20 banks, exchangers or any financial institutions operating domestically, the Central Banks requires from each bank or institution a 25 % of their total current deposits , what known banking terminology as "reserve required surplus". The Central Bank normally acts as a middle person or like traffic control of any transactions between payees and recipients.

    So, if a bank or ZAAd collapse or bankrupt or catastrophic fraud arises in any circumstance the Central Bank reimburses to recipient as compensation in lieu of goods or services not received and deducting from the " 25% of reserve required surplus account" that already with Central Bank in order to save guide the public rights.

    Hence, in absence of Central Bank Rigid control procedures or monetary policies, there where the danger lays.

     Reply
  16. gert nelausen says:

    I AM A DANISH CITISEN,73 YEARS OLD,COPENHAGEN,DENMARK,ON PENSION,SO I HAVE THE TIME TO SERVE MY COUNTRY FREE .DO YOU NEED ANY INFORMATION ABOUT DENMARK YOU ARE WELLCOME TO CONTACT ME ON: nelausengert@live.dk .
    you can find my cv on facebook. ÅLL TYPES OF INFO I CAN PROVIDE YOU WITH AS A STARTER ON BUSINESS WITH DENMARK. IT IS FREE OF CHARGE FOR YOU EXCEPT YOU FEEL A PERSONAL MEETING OR BUSINEES FRIENSHIP COUD BE USEFULL.

     Reply
  17. Berri says:

    @Zakariye
    Yes such term "NGP" not in economics … Sorry for typo and it's GNP but pupils can understand easily it's transposition typo error.

    Ok, once more, let's go back to the basic drawing board just for argument sake.

    1) Gross domestic product (GDP) refers to the market value of all final goods and services produced within a country in a given period. So, in this case, No foreign remittance involvement here, in other words see below equations; GDP = private consumption + gross investment + government spending + (exports − imports), or GDP = C + I + G + (X-M)

    Please never be confused with Gross national product or Gross domestic income. (GNP) with (GDP) and here below are the clear and simple definition difference.

    2) Gross National Product (GNP) is the market value of all products and services produced in one year by labor and property supplied by the residents of a country. Also, No foreign remittance involvement here too. Why foreign remittance not included in both equations? Because you can see with AUDIENCE on the above both definitions:

    GDP (1) refers "within a country in a given period.
    While GNP (2) referred labor and property supplied by the residents of a country.

    I know one can be confused easily with this While says GNP measures the output generated by a country's enterprises (whether physically located domestically or abroad).But here it concern Enterprises or International which ownership is register in the original country such as Shell Oil Company because tax payment to their original country because the performance.

    Not Somaliland employee who performed a services for foreign country. No tax payment or performance productivity in economy measurement for Somaliland.

    Final Note: Yes doubt about how foreign Remittance can benefit Somaliland economy tremendously because huge cash inflow for economy injection positively but question was is it include in GNP or GDP performance measurements calculations or not.

    Kindly, let me where are the depreciations that normally incurs domestically and abroad fits in GDP and GNP?

     Reply
  18. mursal jama says:

    kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk

     Reply