October 4, 2012 · 16 Comments
Hargeisa-Somaliland President H.E Ahmed Mohamed Mahmoud ( Silanyo) has today signed the Islamic Banking bill into law on according to press statement issued by the Presidential spokesperson Mr. ahmed Saleban Dhuxul .
The long awaited banking law bill had earlier passed the national assembly were lawmakers vote in favor of the bill.
By Presidential Spokesperson: Ahmed Salaben Dhuxul
Tags: Islamic law, President Silanyo, Somaliland
I keep reading the need to separate religion from politics. You cannot separate Islam from life, you cannot make what is halal haram or vice versa but there is a whole area in life that we are allowed to make our own choices. The need to keep looking to the West for ideas on how to run our country does not mean giving up our religion nor allowing it to be hijacked by extremist or opportunists.
@ Comeagain—interesting you should bring up Turkey—Actually the Turkish economy was not doing well for years. Turkey only became the economic and political power house it is today in the last ten years under Erdogan. His whole political vision is to make Turkey a more Islamic country. He's gotten rid of many of the laws that were against Islam—such as the banning of the hijab in public instituitions. His wife is the first first lady in Turkey to wear the hijab. In fact you could say that be becoming more Islamic and returning to their religion the Turkish people have found success.
Nora actually no Turkey is successful because of Ataturk please refer to the biographies. Erdogan etc only came after Ataturk laid the ground work!
HornId exactly why should other people be held hostage to someone elses beliefs? Somaliland citizens should have the choice and from what I gathered there wasnt a vote on this at all!
Imagine if in western nations you were not given the option of having an interest free account!
Amal secular means you actually have to run the country while separating religion from politics. So saying you have a secular muslim state is an oxymoron. Completely contradictory terms, either you have a muslim state or you have a secular state.
In America we are having the same problem with the Religious Right claiming that America is a christian nation when in fact it is not, it was not even set up as a christian nation. This is exactly why people from all over the world with different religion can live here and thrive.
You are one confused dude walahi. You cannot reason with a confused dude. Secular Muslim country is not an oxymoron (but Islamic secular is)
Somaliland is more secular than religious. We have our own laws that is nothing to do with religion such as our own way of leading, democracy and other wordy matters etc. Somaliland is more cultural than Islamic.
But you cannot fully separate Islam from a majority Muslim population. I am not saying we have to be like Saudia Arabia where they force the religion on their people especially women. What I am saying is that our system should cater for the majority who are Muslims like having islamic banking, no tax work like dubai etc but the population can either follow their religion or not (no force) and it's up to them. Also no segregation between genders.
And I have no problem with you catering to the majority but also cater to the minority who dont want to be held hostage to the majority which is what democracy is about. like having both interest bearing accounts and non interest bearing accounts
I have read the history of Muslim spain. But dont think that non muslims had equal rights to muslims. What many historians do is just point out that Islamic spain was just better than most but lets face it it wasnt ideal, atleast compared to the equality/laws that we have now.
An Interesting book that woke me up is called An Illusion of Harmony:Science and Religion in Islam by Taner Edis take a look.
Even the science that my muslim teachers used to say for instance algebra was not invented by muslims but by Babylonians, indians and greeks and then perfected by rene descartes. Lets remember as rome fell the arabs came into contact with text from greeks and romans and translated them.
anyways i digress trust me when I say that when you look at the totality of human kinds laws and try to find ones that will lead to the majority of peoples happiness it is not islamiclaws but secular laws that win out. Proof is in the pudding.
Let me know if there is anything else you need
"dont think that non muslims had equal rights to muslims" stop lying man. Non Muslims had more than equal rights, the jews even called it their golden era. Jews were mistreated by christian population but during Muslim era they had freedom.
There was no even books until Muslims era in Spain in where the first European paper production started. Spain was the center of world education. People used to travel from all over Europe to Muslim Spain to learn medicine, architecture etc They had huge Liberian stored with Knowledge.
Again walalo all the knowledge the arabs had came from where the translations they got from sacking cities like Constantinople now Istanbul! The translated the greek and roman texts and that is why many in europe came to spain to seek them out. Because in the christian nations they turned into extremists which is what i am saying we should stay away from. Have your religion just separate it from state affairs!
Yes Islam was better to minorities than christianity but was it Ideal in the sense that the west is now, HELL NO! Imagine if the kufar had you pay a special tax for being muslim etc
You say that islamic law is better than secular law. Lets compare…..A youngman steals a cell phone Islam: Chop his hand off. Secular law: Pay a fine or community service with a record of your transgression. Hmmmm tough decision!
The secular law gives the youngman time to think on his actions, makes him pay a fine if he is able, if not community service or the like. Islamic Law chopped limb leaves the young man scared both mentally and physically. Which law is going to have a better chance of influencing the young man as he grows older and for the better?
@ Comeagain
No it is Erodgan that is credited with Turkey's current boom and he is the anti-Ataturk. Turkey was nothing more than a poor country under secularist rule. Read any news paper or even Wikipedia. On wikipedia it clearly states that:
"In 2002, Erdoğan inherited a Turkish economy deep in recession due to the financial crisis during the coalition government under the leadership of Ecevit"
Erodgan's party is credited for making Turkey so successful. The man has transformed the country and many see him as a role model for Muslim leaders around the world. The whole basis of everything he does however is rooted in Islam and returning Turkey to being an Islamic state.
Another up and coming economic tiger is Indonesia an Islamic state.
A lot of Islamic countries escaped the current economic crisis because of their use of Islamic banking and many western banks and institutions are looking to them as examples. So, yes Islam is very relevant in todays society.
@Comeagin
Actually as the Roman Empire fell and Europe entered the dark ages, Europeans began to see all the works of the Romans and Greeks in Science, Math and philosphy as the work of pagans and blasphemous, and began to destory them. Islamic scholars, however, preserved these works because they saw their importance and relevance and it's thanks to them that we have many of these things around today.
I will say one thing—muslims back then were more enlightened then the ones nowadays. Nowadays it's Muslims we have entered the dark ages. I would say that Islam is not the problem but Muslims are the problem. Islam encourages discovery, knowledge and innovation—yet these are the things many Muslims think is blasphemous.
Exactly the Europeans went crazy into Religion and not into science and secular law which is exactly where the Muslim world is headed. So technically you are heading towards the very thing that your running away from.
Islam is the problem along with hard line muslims. Any religion that cannot change with time is doomed to fail, especially if the societies it is in are moving ahead. Also, when Islam started to view science below religion is when they started to fail. Please look at the embryology in the quran it was ripped off from galen and mohammed even copied the mistakes of galen! But we are supposed to believe that this is the word of the creator. But you have people trying to pass off this info as science.
Turkey is not an Islamic run country that is why it is succeeding! Just look at its banks which did not fail, they took riba etc but kept themselves from riskier issues like many other banks (see iceland/after they kicked out the russian guy).
Whats making Turkey successful lets face it is good non-Islamic secular laws both in financial, and social segments. If Turkey was really a muslim country by laws then it would be like Saudi Arabia or Pakistan etc. But it is not!
Letting women wear more hijabs is not going to lead to more economic success if that were the case, hargeisa would be a power house on that merit alone.
Banking.
You ask the bank for 10,000 to buy a car. The car is in your name. You pay the bank the 10,000 back plus interest, it is called a loan.
You open a savings account, the bank pays you a dividend, it is called interest.
Islamic Banking:
You ask the bank for 10,000 to buy a car. The car is in the banks name (until fully repaid). You pay the bank the 10,000 back plus interest (the interest is called a 'gift' even though its mandatory)……………. it is not called a loan.
You open a savings account, the bank pays you a dividend (though its not obliged to)……….. it is called a gift.
The only difference is naming rhetoric and that Islamic banking is stacked in the bank's favour. If recent events haven't proven to you all banks are crooks you're beyond hope. If you have to deal with a bank, deal with the one the financial authorities have the most tightly reined in.